Posted by Benji Riggins on March 29, 2010 under Flood | 
As insurance and real estate agents and homeowners feared, Congress left Washington without extending the federal flood insurance program.
Congress adjourned until April 12 after failing to agree on an unemployment benefits bill that included a provision with an extension of the National Flood Insurance Program.
As a result, the federal flood insurance program’s authority to write new policies ends on Sunday, March 28 at midnight. After that time, insurance agents will not be able to provide new or renewal flood insurance policies, which are required by lenders to close on some real estate sales.
Senator Tom Coburn, R- Okla., blocked the Senate from voting on the bill to extend the jobless benefits arguing that to do so would add to the deficit. Democrats argued that the measure qualified as emergency spending.
A similar impasse occurred at the end of February and the NFIP was closed for several days until Congress renewed it on March 2.
But this time the hiatus will be longer.
Congress could reinstate the NFIP and other affected programs retroactively when it returns on April 12.
The NFIP expiration last month caused headaches for insurance agents and their customers as well as delays for some consumers waiting to close on the sale of a property within a flood hazard area.
While no new policies can be issued during a lapse in NFIP authorization, consumers with current flood insurance policies remain covered. Claims payments are not affected.
The NFIP has issued guidance for operating during an interruption.
FEMA is expected to issue updated guidance soon.
Posted by Benji Riggins on March 5, 2010 under Flood |
The U.S. Senate last night passed legislation that includes an extension of the federal flood insurance program until March 28. President Obama has signed the measure.
The extension means that the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which has been unable to issue policies since its authorization expired at midnight on Feb. 28, should be able to again start issuing new and renewal policies. NFIP issued a memo on Feb. 26 that included guidelines for operations during a hiatus. However, the agency has not yet released any follow-up guidance for insurers or agents following this reauthorization.
The several days’ hiatus did not affect NFIP claims paying. The program insures more than 5 million properties.
The emergency legislation reauthorizing funding for the flood program was part of a larger $10 billion bill dealing with unemployment insurance, subsidies for COBRA benefits, transportation projects and several other federal programs.
The legislation had been held up by Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., who objected that it did not address funding. Supporters said that as emergency legislation, it was exempt from the “pay-as-you-go” law. Bunning eventually agreed to lift his hold after being permitted to offer an amendment on funding, which was defeated. The unemployment benefits legislation with the flood insurance reauthorization then passed with a bipartisan vote of 79-19.
The NFIP sunset caused delays for some consumers waiting to close on the sale of a property within a flood hazard area.
While no new policies could be issued during the lapse in authorization, consumers with current policies remained covered by the federal program, according to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
This short-term extension is itself an extension of a previous emergency authorization of NFIP. In December, the Senate extended it to Feb. 28.
Last Thursday, the House passed the bill addressing the expiring federal programs, but Bunning’s opposition kept the Senate from advancing the legislation before the NFIP’s Feb. 28 deadline.
Congress has been working on longer-term legislation to authorize NFIP for up to five years, which would be welcomed by the insurance industry.
“We applaud the Senate for recognizing the urgency in extending the National Flood Insurance Program,” said David Sampson, president and CEO of the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI). “This vitally important program protects over five million families across the country. The recent debate in Congress underscores the need to bring greater certainty and stability to the flood program in 2010 and advance a long-term extension that ensures the program’s fiscal soundness.”
Posted by Benji Riggins on March 1, 2010 under Flood |
The Senate last week failed to vote on bills to extend several federal programs including jobless benefits, COBRA subsidies, transportation project funding and flood insurance before these programs expired Feb. 28.
A single senator, Jim Bunning, R-Ky., has derailed final approval of the programs’ extensions over concerns about how to pay for them, especially the extension of unemployment benefits.
The result is that the programs could be in limbo for about a week while the Senate finds a way to get the job done. The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) will not be able to issue new policies, increase coverage, approve renewal policies or pay claims until Congress approves reauthorization.
Bunning maintains that Congress has not paid for these extensions through any new funding or cuts as is required. Bunning, who is not running for re-election, said he supports extension of the benefits and programs including flood insurance but feels funding should be clear.
“The only difference I have, and some of my good friends from the other side of the aisle, is that I believe we should pay for it. There is a right over the last three years of the Democratically controlled Congress. We have run up $5 trillion in debt. There has to be a time to stop that,” Bunning said on the Senate floor.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid vowed that the measures would pass sometime this week but criticized the Republican’s tactics in delaying the approval of the programs.
“We talk a lot about Senate procedure in our debates, and that’s often appropriate. But it’s also often complex,” Reid said. “The catch here is that these benefits do not need to expire. We have the ability right now to extend them for just a short time until we work out a longer-term solution. It is irresponsible not to. It is immoral.”
If approved, the current bill would only extend the NFIP for a month, until March 28. There have been several short-term extensions within the past year.
The House has already approved the bills.
Guidelines for Carriers, Agents
The Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA), which manages the flood program, issued a bulletin on Feb. 27 with guidelines for insurers and agents participating in the program in the event of a lapse. The agency did say that “any hiatus period should be brief, and most of the nearly 5.6 million flood insurance policyholders nationwide will not be affected.”
New policies for which insurers received payment on or before midnight of Feb. 28 will be issued and will become effective after the last day of effective authorization, regardless of the policy effective dates.
The NFIP recommends that companies writing flood insurance hold any premiums, renewals or added coverage endorsements received on or after Feb. 28.
Eventual reauthorization will likely be granted retroactively, and insurers can issue policies effective as of the date they received payments, according to FEMA.
Policies with a 30-day waiting period would become effective when both the 30-day waiting period has ended and Congress has reauthorized the NFIP.
By Andrew G. Simpson
March 1, 2010
Posted by Benji Riggins on December 16, 2009 under Flood |
Time is running out once again for the National Flood Insurance Program, which is set to expire on Dec. 18.
Congress passed a short-term extension in September that moved the expiration deadline for NFIP to Dec. 18, 2009. But if Congress fails to act again this week, the main source of protection against flooding for more than five and a half million homeowners could be in jeopardy, potentially costing the government and taxpayers billions of dollars.
Insurers are urging Congress to pass an extension to the NFIP before it’s too late.
“The expiration of the flood insurance program could have severe consequences on the economy and directly impact consumers,” said David A. Sampson, president and CEO of the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI).
PCI says that a continuing resolution will likely pass today that will extend the NFIP through Dec. 23. The continuing resolution will give the Senate a few more days to work on the Defense Appropriations bill, which would now extend the program through Feb. 28, 2010.
“We cannot afford to compound the economic challenges our nation already faces by allowing the NFIP to lapse,” Sampson said. “If NFIP expired, real-estate transactions in flood-prone areas could collapse, resulting in even more devastation for the housing market.”
Source: PCI
Posted by Benji Riggins on September 25, 2009 under Flood |
On October 1, 2009, important changes to the NFIP will take effect. There will be an increase in rates, the standard deductibles, and the basic insurance limits. These combined changes will result in an average premium increase of 8 percent . Many policyholders will have questions about these changes. To help you best serve our clients, we have developed a number of “answers to possible questions” to help our customers better understand how these changes will affect them.
Q: Why are my premiums going up?
A: It is not uncommon for insurance companies to implement annual rate increases to help offset their increased costs, including inflation. The NFIP, like most insurance companies, has found it necessary to implement these important program changes to ensure that current premiums more accurately reflect the current risks.
Q: Are the rates increasing to collect the premium dollars that were used to pay for claims as a result of Hurricane Katrina?
A: No. It is a misconception that rate increases happen to offset debts attributed to Hurricane Katrina or any past event. Actually, Federal regulations clearly state that the NFIP cannot raise rates to recoup for previous losses. Simply put, NFIP premiums only reflect expected future losses and expenses. There is no charge contained in the premium to recoup past losses.
Q: Why is my deductible doubling?
A: The NFIP’s previous minimum deductibles were in place for more than 10 years. The NFIP found it necessary to discontinue the minimum deductible of $500 and increase the new standard deductibles to avoid overall larger premium increases.
It is important to remember, that in most cases the deductible is only a fraction of the average flood insurance claim, which can cost tens of thousands of dollars.
Q: Why are the basic limits of coverage on the Standard Flood Insurance Policy (SFIP) for residential and non-residential buildings increasing?
A: The NFIP takes many steps to financially prepare for future flooding. In order to do so, the basic limit of coverage, the level which sustains the most damage in a flood, needs to be brought into better alignment with the typical NFIP paid claim.
If you purchase flood insurance beyond the basic limit, you will receive more coverage at a lesser charge. And, to get full replacement cost for your primary residence in the event of a flood, you must insure your building to at least 80 percent of its replacement value (or $250,000, whichever is less).
