Record Number of Disasters in 2011 Reinforces Need for Preparedness, Says IBHS

Posted by Benji Riggins on February 6, 2012 under Safety | Be the First to Comment

Disasters demonstrate the need for home and business owners to evaluate their risk of damage and take steps to reduce that risk ahead of time.

The record number of natural disasters in the U.S. this year demonstrates the need for home and business owners to evaluate their risk of damage and take steps to reduce that risk ahead of time, says the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS).

The federal government has declared 86 major disasters so far in 2011, surpassing the previous annual record of 81 last year. “No matter where you are located, you are at risk for one or more natural hazards that could significantly damage or destroy your home or business,” said Julie Rochman, president & CEO, IBHS. “A complete evaluation of how best to protect your specific property starts with knowing and understanding the type(s) of risks that may affect your area.”

To that end, IBHS provides a free ZIP Code-based tool on their public website at www.disastersafety.org. When a property owner enters their ZIP Code, a list of natural hazards common to the area is shown.

Once a property owner has identified the risks they may face, the next step is to determine their home or commercial building’s specific vulnerability. Then, they can use IBHS guidance to learn how to reduce the risk of damage or destruction. “There are many strategies a home or business owner can employ to prevent or greatly lessen the risk of property damage due to a natural disaster,” Rochman said. “Some of these protections come at a cost, but many of them are low- or no-cost options that require nothing more than a bit of effort on the part of the property owner.”

For example, to reduce a property’s vulnerability to wildfire, firewood and other highly combustible materials should not be located close to a home or business. This no-cost solution involves moving firewood and leftover building materials, as well as items such as wheelbarrows containing these materials, at least 30 feet from any structure.

Another example is to inspect the exterior walls of your property for gaps around pipes where they enter the walls. Also check for any gaps around electrical outlet boxes, junction boxes, circuit breaker boxes, disconnect switches and electric meters. Seal any gaps found with waterproof caulk. This will help prevent wind-driven water, such as the heavy rains that often accompany hurricanes and thunderstorms – as well as winter sleet and snow – from entering your building.

“These are just two examples of many low- or no-cost ways to reduce the risk of disaster-related property damage,” Rochman said. “IBHS’ website – www.disastersafety.org – provides home and business owners with free, step-by-step instructions and information on dozens of projects that will help your protect property.”

To arrange an interview with IBHS, contact Joseph King at 813-675-1045/813-442-2845, jking@ibhs.org or via direct message on Twitter @jsalking.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Flood insurance misconceptions: 8 facts you should know

Posted by Benji Riggins on January 20, 2012 under Flood | Be the First to Comment

If you don’t think your home is at risk for flooding, think again.

People outside of high-risk flood areas receive one-third of disaster assistance for flooding and file more than 20 percent of flood insurance claims, the National Flood Insurance Program says. Floods happen in all 50 states — not just hurricane-prone coastal areas — and are the most common natural disaster in the United States.

“Maybe if you lived on top of a mountain along the Continental Divide, maybe then you wouldn’t need flood insurance, but that’s about the only place you don’t need it,” says J. Fletcher Willey Jr., president of The Willey Agency in Nags Head, N.C.

Yet flood insurance is one of the most misunderstood types of insurance coverage. Here are eight facts to clear up some of the most common misconceptions about coverage through the National Flood Insurance Program:

1. No flood coverage under home insurance

Many people still assume standard renters and home insurance covers floods, says Larry Case, executive vice president of the Missouri Association of Insurance Agents. But you must purchase a separate flood insurance policy to protect your home and belongings from flood damage.

Most flood insurance is provided through the National Flood Insurance Program, administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. You can buy federal flood insurance from companies and agents certified to sell it if your community participates in the National Flood Insurance Program.

2. Flood insurance has caps

The amount of coverage you can buy through the NFIP is capped at $250,000 for a home’s structure and $100,000 for contents.

If you want more coverage, you have to buy excess flood insurance, which is sold by private insurance companies. The excess policy covers the cost of flood damage over and above the $250,000/$100,000 caps.

3. Coverage limited in basements

The distinctions can be tricky, so read the policy for details. Some structural elements in the basement are covered, such as central air conditioners, foundation walls, electrical outlets, furnaces and hot water heaters. However, carpeting and floor tile are not covered.

Some appliances in the basement are covered, such as washers and dryers, portable air conditioners and freezers. But refrigerators are not covered. Most personal belongings–including furniture, clothing and electronic equipment–are not covered when they’re in the basement.

4. Building and contents insurance required

A standard home insurance policy automatically covers personal belongings up to a certain percentage of the home’s insured value. With flood insurance, you must purchase contents coverage as well as building coverage to get both.

5. No additional living expenses provided

If your home is destroyed by fire, homeowner insurance pays for the cost to rent comparable living quarters until the house is rebuilt. But flood insurance does not include coverage for additional living expenses. You foot the bill to rent a place to live while your home is being repaired after a flood.

6. No replacement cost coverage for personal belongings

Unlike standard home insurance, which lets you purchase replacement cost coverage for personal belongings, flood insurance features only actual cash value coverage for possessions.

Replacement cost coverage reimburses you for the cost to buy a new item to replace a destroyed belonging. Actual cash value coverage takes depreciation into account and reimburses you for the value of the item at the time it was destroyed. So if a flood destroys your 3-year-old television, flood insurance reimburses you for the value of a used TV–not for the cost to buy a new one.

To qualify for replacement cost coverage to rebuild part of a destroyed building, the home must be your principal residence, and you must have insured it for at least 80 percent of the cost to rebuild or up to the $250,000 cap. Otherwise, reimbursement for rebuilding is based on the actual cash value.

7. Limited coverage on valuables

The coverage for valuables, such as furs and fine art, is limited to $2,500. Currency, precious metals and valuable papers, such as stock certificates, are not covered at all.

8. No flood coverage for hot tubs and swimming pools

Flood insurance doesn’t cover property and belongings outside the home. That includes hot tubs, swimming pools, decks, patios, fences, landscaping, walks, wells and septic systems.

Likewise, flood insurance pays for removal of debris in or on the home’s structure, but not in the yard, Willey says.

Finally, don’t wait until water is lapping at the front door to purchase a policy. Flood insurance has a 30-day waiting period from the date of purchase until the time it goes into effect. The only exceptions are if you’re buying additional insurance when renewing a policy or as a result of a map revision, or if a lender requires flood insurance for a home loan.

Read more: http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2011/11/01/flood-insurance-misconceptions-8-facts-should-know/#ixzz1ckCWMw4n

By Barbara Marquand

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Government Study: Texting by Drivers Up by Half in 2010

Posted by Benji Riggins on January 17, 2012 under Interesting Info | Be the First to Comment

New federal safety data shows texting while driving increased 50 percent last year, despite a rush by states to ban the practice.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does an annual survey that watches drivers’ behavior at selected intersections. The latest study caught less than 1 percent texting or manipulating hand-held devices. But it shows that activity increased to 0.9 percent last year, up from 0.6 percent the year before.

The share of drivers speaking in headsets also increased, although hand-held cellphone use remained flat.

The increase in texting while driving came despite bans on the practice in many states. Last month, Pennsylvania became the 35th state to impose a ban.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

North Carolina Farm Bureau Weighs Cutback in Homeowners Policies

Posted by Benji Riggins on January 12, 2012 under Insurance News | Be the First to Comment

One of North Carolina’s largest homeowners’ insurers says it is considering canceling the coverage of up to 70,000 homeowners unless the state Legislature makes changes allowing it to charge higher rates.

North Carolina Farm Bureau Executive Vice President Steve Carroll recently told state lawmakers that the insurer may have to cancel the policies in order to reduce its exposure and make its homeowners’ book of business profitable.

He said that the insurer needs more leeway to enact higher rates, especially given the rising cost of reinsurance, which he said is expected to double as a result of the losses incurred from Hurricane Irene and the spate of tornadoes that touched down in the state last spring.

Carroll estimated that 40 percent of the insurer’s premiums will go towards purchasing reinsurance next year.

“To continue to write property insurance the way we have in North Carolina, we have to have higher rates,” said Carroll.

The North Carolina Rating Bureau negotiates rates on behalf of the 621 property insurers in the state. The proposed rates are then approved, disapproved or modified by the insurance commissioner.

Speaking before a joint legislative Committee on Property Insurance Rate Making, Farm Bureau’s Carroll said the current regulatory structure is workable. However, he said, more emphasis needs to be placed on reinsurance costs and the use of computer models when developing loss estimates.

The Raleigh, North Carolina based-insurer is already making other underwriting changes that could leave an additional 28,000 homeowners scrambling for coverage elsewhere.

Effective January 1, the insurer is following the trend of other carriers to cancel homeowners if they insure their automobiles through another company. The insurer is also canceling homeowners who filed a claim within the last five years.

If the insurer follows through and drops the 70,000 homeowners in addition to the 28,000 policies it is already non-renewing, it would lose about 20 percent of its homeowners’ book of business.

According to the department of insurance, the North Carolina Farm Bureau is the third largest homeowners’ insurer in the state with a 13.9 percent market share.

By Michael Adams | December 29, 2011

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Want to Reduce Cyber Risk? Avoid These 25 Worst Passwords of 2011

Posted by Benji Riggins on December 31, 2011 under Safety | Be the First to Comment

One way to help lower personal and business cyber risk is to avoid using easy-to-crack passwords. SplashData, a password management application maker, recently compiled a list of the 25 worst passwords for the year 2011.

The research results were based on millions of actually stolen passwords that were made available online.

Having tough-to-guess passwords may not necessarily deter sophisticated, determined hackers. But they do make it much more difficult for amateur cyber thieves to breach online accounts. Here is the list of this year’s worst online passwords.

1. password

2. 123456

3. 12345678

4. qwerty

5. abc123

6. monkey

7. 1234567

8. letmein

9. trustno1

10. dragon

11. baseball

12. 111111

13. iloveyou

14. master

15. sunshine

16. ashley

17. bailey

18. passw0rd

19. shadow

20. 123123

21. 654321

22. superman

23. qazwsx

24. michael

25. football

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Federal Flood Insurance Reauthorized Until May 2012

Posted by Benji Riggins on December 27, 2011 under Flood | Be the First to Comment

The federal flood insurance program has been extended until May 31, 2012 under another short-term consolidated appropriations bill (H.R. 2055) passed by the House and Senate and signed into law by President Obama on Dec. 23.

Had the appropriations bill not passed, the National Flood Insurance Program’s authority to issue new or renewal flood insurance policies would have expired at midnight on Dec. 23.

Insurance agents— the Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America (Big “I”) — applauded the reauthorization while continuing to press for a longer term authorization and program reforms.

“It is important to note that our work on this important issue is far from over and the next few months provide ample opportunity for Congress to pass long-term extension and reform legislation that provides the necessary certainty for consumers,” said Charles E. Symington Jr., Big “I” senior vice president for government affairs.

Symington noted that Congress has traditionally extended the program for five year periods in order to provide stability for the marketplace; however, for the last few years Congress had only extended the program for short periods, mostly from 30 days to six months.

“Today’s extension, although greatly appreciated, is just a temporary patch,” said John Prible, Big “I” vice president for federal government affairs.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Holiday Parties or Homeowners’ Follies?

Posted by Benji Riggins on December 16, 2011 under Safety | Be the First to Comment

Hosts Seem Unconcerned About Safety, Liability

As it gets a chillin’, it’s the perfect time to strike the fire, and enjoy the company of family and friends. Opening up one’s home during the holiday season is a heart-warming gesture. All the excitement, however, has some hosts overlooking basic safety issues.

According to MetLife Auto & Home’s American Safety Pulse Poll, only about one-third of potential hosts are concerned about avoiding common safety issues, and taking precautionary steps to prevent unnecessary accidents.

This lack of concern is reason for big worry, considering the last two year’s claim trends during the month of December. For MetLife Auto & Home, fire claims frequency increased by 12.5 percent in December 2009 and 2010. Theft claims frequency increased by 7.7 percent.

“The holiday season and transition to winter in many parts of the country generates higher frequency [certain types of home-related claims] than previous months,” explains Tim Bowen director of homeowners’ claims with Metlife Auto & Home. “We see theft frequency increases around the holidays with claim notices indicating that gifts/recent purchases were stolen. Heating systems are also being used with greater frequency at this time of year and we see more ‘puff back’ type losses with oil fired systems.”

There are a number of everyday safety issues many tend to overlook while planning their parties.

Too Many ‘Cheers’

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), there is an increase in alcohol-related car crashes and fatalities over the holidays. Yet, fewer than half of Americans or 42 percent are concerned that one of their guests would be involved in a drunk-driving-related accident after consuming alcohol on their property. Fifty-eight percent of respondents to the MetLife Auto & Home survey are not concerned about the potential to be named in a lawsuit, should a guest be involved in a drinking and driving accident.

Blazing Holiday Spirit

Decorating is essential to set the mood for festivities. This holiday season, 91 percent of people plan to decorate their homes, but many may be inadvertently exposing their home and guests to an increased risk of fire, if they’re not careful.

“Only 32 percent of those polled expressed concern that their decorations might pose a fire risk to their homes and to their party guests,” says Mike Convery, chief claim officer and vice president of MetLife Auto & Home. “It’s important for hosts to exercise caution with their decorations, especially wax candles, as December has more candle-related fires than any other month of the year, according to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).”

The Grinch Didn’t Steal Christmas

Only one-third of those surveyed expressed concern about the theft of their personal belongings during a party. Many are inviting family (86 percent) and closer friends (74 percent) to their homes. Others plan on inviting less familiar guests, including neighbors (44 percent), co-workers (31 percent) and casual acquaintances (26 percent).

Not Home for the Holidays

Many people are planning a holiday trip, instead of a party, as is the case for 65 percent of those surveyed. However, 19 percent of the respondents said they would not lock all doors and windows before hitting the road. Only 61 percent said they would leave lights on or set lights on a timer system when they are away, potentially putting their homes at risk for a burglary.

This is the third survey in the American Safety Pulse polls series conducted MetLife Auto & Home by ORC International. MetLife Auto & Home, a brand of Metropolitan P&C Insurance Company and its affiliates, is one of the nation’s leading personal lines P&C insurance providers.

MetLife Auto & Home has compiled essential holiday party safety information here outlining how Americans are planning for their parties and some potential pitfalls they may face.

Source: www.metlife.com

By Melissa Stewart

December 13, 2011

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Gov’t Says Holiday Decorating Injuries on the Rise

Posted by Benji Riggins on December 15, 2011 under Interesting Info | Be the First to Comment

`Tis the season for dancing sugar plums, goodwill toward all — and sometimes emergency-room trips from holiday decorating injuries.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission says injuries involving falls from ladders while stringing lights, cuts from broken glass ornaments and other decorating activities are on the rise. The government estimates that more than 13,000 people were treated in emergency rooms for such injuries during the last two months of last year, up from 10,000 in 2007.

The commission also reminds that those twinkling lights on the Christmas tree can erupt into flames in a matter of seconds.

CPSC says Christmas tree fires are blamed for about four deaths each year and $18 million in property damage.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

True Insurance news story.

Posted by Benji Riggins on December 9, 2011 under Interesting Info | Be the First to Comment

A lawyer in Charlotte, NC purchased a box of very rare and expensive cigars, then insured them against fire among other things. Within a month, having smoked his entire stockpile of these great cigars and without yet having made even his first premium payment on the policy, the lawyer filed a claim with the insurance company.

In his claim, the lawyer stated the cigars were lost “in a series of small fires.” The insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason: that the man had consumed the cigars in the normal fashion. The lawyer sued….and won! In delivering the ruling the judge agreed with the insurance company that the claim was frivolous. The judge stated nevertheless, that the lawyer held a policy from the company in which it had warranted that the cigars were insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure them against fire, without defining what is considered to be “unacceptable fire,” and was obligated to pay the claim. Rather than endure lengthy and costly appeal process, the insurancecompany accepted the ruling and paid $15,000.00 to the lawyer for his loss of the rare cigars lost in the “fires.”

But… After the lawyer cashed the check, the insurance company had him arrested on 24 counts of ARSON! With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case used against him, the lawyer was convicted of intentionally burning his insured property and was sentenced to 24 months in jail and a $24,000.00 fine.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

New insurance rules draw ire

Posted by Benji Riggins on December 7, 2011 under Insurance News | Be the First to Comment

Gary Puffpaff was irritated when he got a letter from Allstate Insurance informing him his homeowners’ policy wouldn’t be renewed because he had his auto insurance with another company.

Not only did Puffpaff question whether the insurer’s action was legal – which, it turns out, it is – but he also was upset because Allstate canceled his auto policies a half-dozen years ago after he filed three large claims.

“Every time I see their commercial I laugh about what they say, because I don’t believe a word … about (how) they take care of you and all that,” said Puffpaff, 61, a repair technician who lives in Charlotte. “They only want your money.”

This year, two of the most popular underwriters of homeowners insurance policies in North Carolina – Allstate and N.C. Farm Bureau – adopted underwriting guidelines that link homeowners policies with auto policies across the state.

Both companies cite economics as the reason for their stance. In the case of Allstate, if you don’t have an auto insurance policy from us, they’re telling customers, your homeowners policy won’t be renewed.

The Farm Bureau’s guidelines are slightly different, winnowing out those who don’t have a Farm Bureau auto policy and who also have filed a claim on their homeowners policies within the past five years. Similarly, new Farm Bureau customers who want to buy a homeowners policy also will have to buy auto insurance.

Like many insurers, it also offers a discount for bundled policies. The Farm Bureau also will “reconsider” renewing a homeowners policy if a customer wants to purchase an auto policy after being notified of the company’s new guidelines, said Steve Carroll, executive vice president and general manager at Raleigh-based Farm Bureau.

That’s not an option with Allstate, said spokesman Tracy Owens. Allstate’s underwriting guidelines, which took effect at the beginning of the year, affect 46,000 homeowners policyholders; Farm Bureau’s guidelines, which take effect Jan. 1, will affect 28,000 homeowners policyholders, according to the companies. Policyholders are being notified about the new guidelines 60 to 90 days in advance of their policy renewal date.

Farm Bureau ranks third, with a 13.9 percent share, in the state’s homeowners insurance market and Allstate ranks fourth with an 8.7 percent share, according to the state Insurance Department.

The department searched its database of consumer complaints at The (Raleigh) News & Observer’s request and found it received 33 complaints about the policy linkage this year.

Fairness is a judgment call, but linking policies is considered legal in North Carolina. Bob Mack, deputy commissioner of the Insurance Department’s property and casualty division, said state law doesn’t regulate underwriting guidelines – which spell out under what circumstances an insurer will sell you a policy – “provided it’s not discriminatory.”

Insurers have adopted similar underwriting guidelines in North Carolina in the past. Insurers have adopted such guidelines in other states, but not always successfully.

In 2007, Allstate discontinued its practice of linking homeowners policies with auto policies or life insurance policies after New York regulators directed it to do so, according to the trade publication Insurance Journal.

State regulators contended the practice violated anti-rebating and anti-discrimination sections of New York insurance law; Allstate complied with the directive even though it contended it had the legal right to link the policies.

The policy linkage required by Farm Bureau and Allstate in North Carolina is one-way only. Both companies are willing to provide your auto insurance even if you don’t have a homeowners policy with them.

That makes sense because auto insurance is viewed by the industry as an attractive business and homeowners insurance isn’t, Mack said. “It’s a business decision that we’re doing this,” said the Farm Bureau’s Carroll. “No insurance company likes to discontinue coverage.”

When it comes to homeowners insurance, “even in a good year … we’re lucky to break even,” Carroll said.

This year, he said, hasn’t been a good year, with Hurricane Irene, the deadly tornadoes that tore through the state and a flurry of other storms.

Raising insurance premiums isn’t an option now. The state regulates homeowners insurance and imposes a cap on premiums.

“Obviously, the decision was carefully considered,” said Allstate spokesman John Heid. “It’s the right decision that will help us remain financially strong for the customers and the communities we serve.”

Of the top five homeowners insurance companies in the state, only Farm Bureau and Allstate have such guidelines.

The other three – State Farm, Nationwide and USAA, which caters to current and former members of the military and their families – say that they don’t link homeowners and auto policies and have no plans to do so.

By David Ranii
dranii@newsobserver.com

Posted: Friday, Nov. 25, 2011

Read more: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/11/25/2802958/new-insurance-rules-draw-ire.html#ixzz1ej9V3k8w

Read more: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/11/25/2802958/new-insurance-rules-draw-ire.html#ixzz1ej9Q05ib

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon